Skip to main content
  1. Blog/

Comparing Open-Source LLMs for Customer-Service Conversation Summaries

·1 min
Author
Chengyu
I’m Chengyu — a final-year Computer Science student at the University of Sydney. I write about the things I build and break, plus hiking, travel, gaming, and gadgets.
Table of Contents

Background
#

Testing whether locally-hosted, open-source models are good enough to take a customer-service conversation — after it’s been converted from speech to text — and produce a usable summary. All of this ran on consumer-grade GPU hardware, since that’s what’s actually practical for a setup like this.

Models tested
#

Ten models pulled via Ollama:

ModelSize
llama3:70b39 GB
llama3:latest4.7 GB
deepseek-v2:latest8.9 GB
llama3-groq-tool-use:latest4.7 GB
wangshenzhi/gemma2-9b-chinese-chat:latest5.8 GB
glm4:9b5.5 GB
gemma2:latest5.4 GB
gemma2:27b15 GB
qwen2:72b41 GB
qwen2:7b4.4 GB

Evaluation approach
#

Each model was scored across three dimensions: how accurately it captured the customer’s underlying intent, how well it documented the steps the agent actually took, and how precisely it identified the core issue. Scores were gathered from a mix of perspectives — customer-service staff, ML practitioners, and end users — and averaged into a final result.

Evaluation results

Related

LLM Agents 101

·2 mins
What an ‘agent’ actually means in the context of large language models, and a worked example in a customer-service setting.